Cheryl Chumley -- Donald Trump's detractors are the modern day Alexander Hamilton's

Cheryl Chumley -- Donald Trump's detractors are the modern day Alexander Hamilton's



Founding Fathers didn't intend for the country's politics to be run by parties. Rather, as George Washington himself warned in his 1796 Farewell Address, political parties would bring partisanship, division and ultimately, "despotism" and tyranny

Pastor Dick Carmack -- Beginning of Sorrows

Pastor Dick Carmack -- Beginning of Sorrows



There is no hope for anyone who is outside of Christ! Thankfully there is still time for repentance and forgiveness.

Devvy Kidd -- I hope Trump Supporters Are Right About Donald Trump

Devvy Kidd -- I hope Trump Supporters Are Right About Donald Trump

Kissinger, member: Bilderberg, Tri-Lateral, Alfalfa Club, Pratt House, Pilgrims Society, Council on Foreign Relations. A short list of 'secret' societies that determine OUR future. All are staunch advocates of world government and the complete and total surrender of our sovereignty.

Moscow's Man in Washington? - read. Something many of us have known for decades. Where there's enough smoke you'll find fire.

"On August 14, 1975, during a press conference at the Hyatt House in Birmingham, Alabama, Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger was asked a most embarrassing question. The reporter asked:

"Mr. Secretary, we received a report that a Colonel General Michael Goleniewski, who was a Polish Army intelligence officer in World War II, had identified a list of KGB and GRU agents and officers who have since been arrested, tried and convicted.

"The General. . . also identified you, Mr. Kissinger, as having worked for a Soviet intelligence network -- code name ODRA -- headquartered in Germany during World War II, at the same time you were a U.S. Army counter-interrogator and instructor in a military intelligence school. . .

"Is this true? And, if not, how do you explain your name being on General Goleniewski's list?"

Betty Freauf -- Let's Rebuild The Nation Together

Betty Freauf -- Let's Rebuild The Nation Together

the New World Order neocons in the GOP seem destined to destroy someone outside of government who wins the presumptive Republican nominee for president by the name of Donald Trump. People have been turning out by the thousands to see him at his rallies and bringing in perhaps millions of desperately needed new Republicans, and we’re fussing and fuming over transgender toilets ?

AND WE ARE WORRIED ABOUT TRANSGENDERS IN THE BATHROOMS?

A middle-aged brunette Connecticut woman with short hair and glasses was mistaken for a transgender in a Walmart and according to the New York Daily News says a woman walked up to her and told her “You are not supposed to be here! You need to leave!” Didn’t gay used to mean merry, jovial? It’s been so long since we’ve used it that way, I had to check the Webster’s 1828 dictionary. First it was used for the sodomites who hijacked Civil Rights movement but now it’s morphed into transgender which just goes to show once again how these words are first used to produce fear in people and have been invented to gradually change our culture to meet the Calvinist’s definition of depraved and in need of a Savior.

REPENT, THE JUDGMENT OF GOD IS COMING ON THIS NATION

Is Paul ‘Bailout’ Ryan Facilitating Massive Fraud in Puerto Rico? Asks Wisconsin Challenger Paul Nehlen | Paul Nehlen

Is Paul ‘Bailout’ Ryan Facilitating Massive Fraud in Puerto Rico? Asks Wisconsin Challenger Paul Nehlen | Paul Nehlen



Massive fraud? underway with the help of Speaker Ryan.

Diane Kepus -- Danger: Gulan Charter Schools and the Fethullah Gulan Movement

Diane Kepus -- Danger: Gulan Charter Schools and the Fethullah Gulan Movement

Enemies Within

Gulen CIA Brennan
I would like to remind the readers that it was the CIA who supported Gulen being allowed to come into this country supposedly because he was ill with the endorsement of Graham Fuller, now former CIA agent. Sorry CIA but diabetes can be treated all over the world. The FBI had started several investigations against the Gulen operation for numerous reasons, one of them to prevent Gulen from being granted permanent residency in America and to have him deported. Even though the FBI had determined Gulen to be a “Radical Islamist”, the Islamic angels in Obama’s White House, CIA and Clinton’s State Dept. reigned in the FBI preventing them from indicting and deporting Gulen and his whole operation. Hum!

Taking a look back in history in case you weren’t aware, the Brennan’s CIA is and has been supporting the Islamic indoctrination of our U.S. children and the whole program here in the U.S. was fundamentally developed by George Soros Center for American Progress and Gulen. The object is to “force feed” our children “Radical Islamic” educational programs and incentives.

Talk about your own government supporting working from inside to ruin YOUR country!

The past and present governors of Texas told their citizens they were protecting their children by not participating in the Common Core ruination of our education system, but instead they have allowed the Gulen movement to grow within the state and also allowing the Gulen Institute to be at home on the grounds of the University of Houston.

Whatever Happened to America | NewsWithViewsStore.com

Whatever Happened to America | NewsWithViewsStore.com



Please obtain this book and read it. It will explain what has been and is the goal of the elite....

United Nations | The UN-American United Nations

United Nations | The UN-American United Nations

However, Communist Chinese influence extends even deeper into the dictator-dominated planetary outfit. Among the UN agencies under the leadership of Beijing’s operatives is the little-known and UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), which in 2013 selected Chinese Communist Li Yong, the regime’s former “vice-minister of finance,” as executive director. “[The regime ruling] China will inevitably need to be given more rights in international activities, such as the right to participate and the right to have a voice in international affairs,” Li was quoted as saying by regime-controlled propaganda outlets.

Even more troubling, perhaps, is the Communist Chinese agent, Houlin Zhao, selected last year to lead the UN International Telecommunications Union (ITU). For years, the UN agency and its mostly autocratic member regimes have been working to usurp control over the Internet. And as if having a Communist Chinese operative whose bosses run a totalitarian censorship regime dubbed the “Great Firewall of China” was not troubling enough, Zhao’s comments raised even more alarm worldwide. “We [at the ITU] don’t have a common interpretation of what censorship means,” the agency chief was quoted as saying by the Korean Yonhap news agency.

Other senior UN figures loyal to the Communist Chinese regime include Margaret Chan, the director-general of the UN World Health Organization. The WHO, of course, has been attempting to usurp increasingly draconian powers over humanity under the guise of “health” on everything from global tobacco taxes and quarantine powers to a planetary “mental health” regime. Last year in Western Africa, citing the Ebola outbreak, Chan claimed “global health authorities” would need to help impose “new measures such as deploying soldiers to quarantine stricken neighborhoods in Sierra Leone,” the Wall Street Journal reported.

Last month, the Council of the UN International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) selected Dr. Fang Liu of Communist China to sit as secretary-general for a three-year term. That UN agency, among other troubling activities, has been at the forefront of the charge to impose UN "carbon" taxes on humanity under the guise of stopping alleged man-made global warming and averting a "trade war," as this magazine reported in 2012. A supposed dispute over CO2 taxes between the European Union and Beijing is what drove efforts to have the global tax on air travel imposed.

As The New American reported from Rio de Janeiro in 2012, meanwhile, the global tyranny-promoting UN Conference on Sustainable Development was chaired by notorious anti-American Chinese Communist Sha Zukang. In addition to openly expressing his hatred of America, the secretary-general of the Rio+20 summit had presented an award to the Chinese general responsible for massacring student protesters at Tiananmen Square. The most recent General Conference of the UN Education, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), which is seeking to impose global “education standards” on humanity, was chaired by former Beijing “education vice-minister” Hao Ping.

That is all just the beginning of Beijing’s long-term plan to accumulate power within the UN, according to the dictatorship itself. In a so-called “blue book” published recently by the regime’s China Institute of International Studies (CIIS), Beijing’s Foreign Ministry said “China will target a bigger role in international affairs after recent successes in global diplomacy,” the Xinhua propaganda and espionage agency reported on April 2. Senior regime officials have been boasting for months that Beijing is training up an army of staffers to infiltrate UN agencies and other “global governance” mechanisms.

When it comes to “global economic governance,” the communist regime has been even bolder. For years, Beijing has beenlobbying for a “de-Americanized” so-called “New World Order” in which it would have, among other powers, far more influence over institutions such as the International Monetary Fund. More than a few supposed U.S. allies, and even the Obama administration, have jumped onboard the bandwagon to give the totalitarian regime, along with the Kremlin, a greater leadership role at the IMF at U.S. expense. The only obstacle now is a U.S. Congress that refuses to sign off on the scheme, but is under major globalist pressure to submit.

TPP — Trilateralist Power Politics

TPP — Trilateralist Power Politics



David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and their fellow CFR/TC/Bilderberg internationalists began then, in the 1970s, to translate their schemes into the political and economic policies that resulted in the massive transfers of American capital and technology to transform China from a pathetic Third World basketcase into a First World economic and military power. Now they are moving to implement the next phase, enact and implement the TPP, which would later be expanded to converge with Communist China in the already-announced Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific (FTAAP).

Newt's Contract with the Earth: Pseudo-Science, Big Government

Newt's Contract with the Earth: Pseudo-Science, Big Government

Most do not associate Newt, however, with his true record, which speaks volumes about his underlying ideology and motivations. This ideology is especially evident in his 2007 book A Contract with the Earth, which he coauthored with environmentalist Terry Maple.

Gingrich’s environmentalism, as is the case with environmentalism in general, is not specifically focused on finding ways to conserve resources and reduce pollution. It is a nuanced, underhanded, and sublimated means of imposing a broader and more ominous set of political reforms. Environmentalism serves as a gateway into the rise of the regulatory state, a more centralized government, higher taxation, increased government spending and deficits, the defeat of the free market, the erosion of national sovereignty, and ultimately the imposition of a global government.

These alarming truths have been most evident in the political thought of Newt Gingrich. His book serves as a window into the dark recesses of his “eco-consciousness,” corroborating his big-government tendencies of which constitutionalists have long warned. Cato Institute Senior Fellow Michael D. Tanne, who has written extensively on how Gingrich has led the Republican Party down its failed path of big-government programs and out-of-control spending, observes the following about him :

Anyone who seriously believes that Gingrich is a small-government conservative in the mold of Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan, should look at the new Contract with America-style manifesto that Newt has proposed as the basis for Republicans to campaign on. Gingrich would expand No Child Left Behind to create national teacher competency standards, and he does not actually call for any specific spending cuts. What he proposes is budget legislation that would lead to a balanced budget in seven years. Perhaps balancing the budget takes so long because he wants to spend so much more on a national energy policy. Gingrich proposes an array of subsidies to every conceivable energy interest group and project from ethanol to hydrogen-powered cars. Of course, there’s nothing in Gingrich’s manifesto about reforming entitlement programs. That’s hardly surprising; Gingrich supported the Medicare prescription drug benefits.

It is within this context of fiscal liberality that Gingrich’s environmentalism finds a logical dwelling place, and many believe that it is these beliefs which resulted in his dismal, single-digit performance in the 2010 and 2011 CPAC straw polls.

Like his big-government manifesto, his treatise on environmentalism is merely another declaration of unconstitutional policies and ineffective, wasteful mechanisms to implement such proposals, including the continuation of unconstitutional federal agencies such as the Department of Energy, the strengthening of the United Nations and other global government enforcement bodies, and even the suggestion that the military ought to be used to enforce environmental policies, a picture Gingrich vividly paints in his book.

A Contract with the Earth differs from other stereotypically-liberal environmentalist treatises only in that it does offer some challenges to the left on the issues of regulation, global warming, and free enterprise. Gingrich does express some disdain for what he calls liberals’ failed reliance on legislation and litigation in environmental protection; he argues in favor of taxpayer-funded rewards to business, rather than government punitive regulations, as means by which an environmentalist agenda can be implemented. He seems to support measures such as tax incentives, rather than policies which curtail free enterprise, such as binding emissions limits. He calls for public-private partnerships in advancing the environmentalist agenda, and does not call for reducing the size of government, instead advocating making big government somehow more “efficient”: “…[O]ur government, at all levels, must be modernized to successfully partner, let alone compete, with the private sector,” (p.196).

Indeed, Newt calls for all sorts of increased government spending and big government programs throughout his treatise:

• He calls for completely new federal environmental programs, citing the unconstitutional National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) as examples: “The U.S. government operates endowments for the humanities and the arts…Perhaps, it is time we consider a new endowment for conservation and the environment,” pp. 115-116.
• He contradicts his previous claim that private enterprise is an effective mechanism by which environmental policies can be advanced, and argues that only government can remedy environmental ills: “…the type of arduous research that produces real breakthroughs can only be funded by astute governments,” p. 167.
• Newt believes that the earth requires a “government takeover,” thus denying evidence by free market environmentalist scholars such as Terry L. Anderson that private ownership has proven to be an economically and historically superior means to environmental stewardship than big government: “Government, at all levels, should be a facilitator for entrepreneurial, private-sector innovations and the formation of private-public environmental partnerships,” p. 13.
• Gingrich claims that income should be redistributed on the local level to “simulate” compliance to environmental regulations among business: “Local governments operate much closer to the origin of environmental problems, and they have begun to provide tax incentives and large cash rewards for environmental compliance…While the motivation is driven by the application of tax dollars, the effect is rewarding rather than punitive,” p. 194.

Gingrich also believes that liberal academia must be the recipient of federal taxpayer funds, even to be used for the controversial and often debunked theory that there is anthropogenic global warming:

“In spite of the demonstrated liberal leanings in academia, we have nothing but respect for the nation’s scientists. They represent America’s best hope to protect the environment. We support a dramatic increase in science and technology research and development because we desperately need to understand global climate change and other environmental phenomena,” p. 201.

Unfortunately, the same liberal academicians for whom Gingrich urges taxpayer funding have been crucial in perpetuating the anthropogenic global climate change hoax, as well as the fraudulent, scandalous, and politicized pseudo-science. Gingrich, for instance, never once mentions the infamous "hockey-stick graph" scandal in his book, nor does he acknowledge any of the many scientific views which challenge the premise that there exists an endangering anthropogenic global warming. According to astronomers Willie Soon and Sallie Bailunas, Professor Michael E. Mann, who created the hockey-stick model, invented the anthropogenic global warming hoax by relying on flawed interpretations of data in order to argue that global temperatures are positively correlated with industrialization. Mann thus perpetuated one of the great politicizations of science ever to occur in the 20th century.

Rather than acknowledging these inconvenient truths, Newt instead marches lockstep to the beat of the environmentalist drum, advocating his belief that anthropogenic global warming is gospel truth:

“We agree that there is plenty of evidence that global climate change is occurring…While humanity is certainly causing its fair share of the change, scientists are still not able to precisely pinpoint the extent of the change, or the margin of error in their estimates,” p. 200.

His book is riddled with even more phony science; he invents the psychiatric diagnosis of “Nature Deficit Disorder” (NDD), relying on the unsubstantiated claims of journalist Richard Louv, who lacks any training in either mental health or medicine. Neither the American Psychiatric Association, nor any other learned societies recognize NDD as a valid diagnosis, and is there is no push to have NDD recognized as a valid diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-V). Louv relies on the unsubstantiated “Biophilia Hypothesis” of Edward O Wilson, who authored the foreword to Gingrich’s book. (Wilson is also a “Secular Humanist Laureate” of the International Academy of Humanists, along with figures such as Fabian Socialist and George Soros mentor Karl Popper). He claims that a lack of environmentalism equates to unsubstantiated psychosocial ills, and this is yet another instance where Newt succumbs to falsehood:

“…our children, according to Louv, run the risk of acquiring ‘nature deficit disorder,’ a malady that he describes as a contributing factor to a recognized mental health construct, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD. Nature deficit disorder, not yet acknowledged by scientists or clinicians, is a working hypothesis that Louv believes helps to explain the onset of ADHD, and he proposes that exposure to nature should be offered as a therapy for children who have difficulty attending to stimuli and learning in conventional classrooms. His call for research in this domain is compelling,” p. 182.

This hypothesis, which claims that humans have an instinctual connection with the environment, is related to so-called “Gaia Philosophy,” named after the pagan Greek goddess of the earth, which argues that the biosphere cosmically becomes “at one” with those who inhabit it. Many scientists have attacked this approach as being teleological and deductive, as opposed to empirical, as it sees the earth as one being, not differing at all from pagan earth-worship. Gingrich himself seems to fall into this line of thinking, essentially adopting such pagan beliefs himself, viewing environmentalism as a “global religion of peace”:

“Far from becoming a new source of global discord, environmentalism, which binds nations to a common concern, will be the best thing that’s ever happened to international relations,” pp. 149-150.

In brief, A Contract with the Earth differs little from other mainstream, liberal presentations of environmental policy. Gingrich does not once challenge the faulty theoretical assumptions upon which much of the modern environmentalist movement relies, and instead, falls into the trap of accepting such assumptions without question. He approaches the question of environmental stewardship from the perspective of one who deductively relies on the following flawed assumptions:

• That government spending and the Leviathan apparatus of centralized, big government provide the best solutions for pressing concerns and problems faced by society (in Newt’s case, this includes energy, the environment, education, health care, and other issues).
• That anthropogenic global warming is gospel truth and has the status of an unquestioned scientific law, despite the scientific evidence to the contrary and the controversy created in the scientific community on the matter.
• That the teleological views of ancient Greek and Celtic paganism regarding earth-worship and the goddess Gaia constitute a legitimate basis upon which environmental problems must be tackled.
• And that inductive reasoning and objectivity matter little in the debate on environmental woes, and that resorting to any falsehood to advocate environmentalism is a proper avenue to be taken, even if it involves relying on invented diagnoses.

Anyone who values such timeless principles as monotheism, objectivity, limited government, and free-market concepts must be advised that A Contract with the Earth offers little more than the same ideas heard among any host of environmentalist liberals, and should not expect to hear anything other than what they can already hear from a host of other big-government ideologues.

Newt Gingrich as VP Would Bring a Big “China Problem” to Team Trump

Newt Gingrich as VP Would Bring a Big “China Problem” to Team Trump

Gingrich is a “senior adviser” to Dentons-Dechang, the world’s largest law firm and a major lobbying force and merger/acquisition operator for the People’s Republic of China (PRC). When he gave interviews in Chicago on May 12 regarding his potential VP selection, it was from the Dentons offices at Chicago’s Willis Tower.

Appearing there with him was Howard Dean, the former Vermont Democratic governor, former Democratic presidential candidate, and former chairman of the Democratic National Committee. Like Gingrich, Dean, the ultra-progressive Democrat, is a senior adviser to the globalist law firm. Another politician who has been recruited for the same elite stable is former Canadian Liberal Party prime minister Jean Chretien.

Chinese Lawyers Must Swear Allegiance to Communist Party

Dentons shot to the top of the list of worldwide legal behemoths when it merged last year with Beijing-based Dacheng, Communist China’s largest law firm. The combined Dentons-Dacheng entity now boasts nearly 7,000 attorneys and 125 offices in more than 50 countries. Dacheng has always been well-connected to China’s Communist Party power structure. Dacheng’s founder and current chairman is Peng Xuefeng, a former government attorney for the communist regime, who now professes to be a champion of the rule of law and human rights. We have not been able to find, however, any statement by Peng or Dentons-Dacheng concerning whether or not Peng and the firm’s other Chinese lawyers have taken the oath required for all attorneys in China.

Kelleigh Nelson -- Be Wary of Bogus Trump Super PAC's

Kelleigh Nelson -- Be Wary of Bogus Trump Super PAC's



See the web the enemy weaves...the NWO, CFR, NEO-CONS.. believe me these are the enemies of America and all of their many entities...And some are even pushing the Con-Con! Mark Meckler is one of the chief honchos of the Con-Con. These are CFR and NEO CONS...not like enemy sounding names....but they are ...against US sovereignty......some are communist, most are socialist progressives ...all are Marxist in some form!!!! Watch Bill Kristol...name names so we know who we are fighting....

Paul Nehlen Slams Ryan on ABC UpFront - YouTube

Paul Nehlen Slams Ryan on ABC UpFront - YouTube

Paul Nehlen Slams Ryan on ABC UpFront - YouTube

Paul Nehlen Slams Ryan on ABC UpFront - YouTube

Conventional wisdom says, if the Neocons run a third-party candidate against Trump, Hillary would win. (Maybe that’s what the Neocons want. After all, Hillary herself is a Neocon.) But what Kristol and company say in response is they think they can siphon enough votes from both Trump and Clinton to throw the race into the House of Representatives--where Neocon House Speaker Paul Ryan could shove an establishment candidate (maybe himself) through the House. It’s only happened twice in U.S. history: in 1800, when the House elected Thomas Jefferson after he and Aaron Burr received an equal number of electoral votes, and in 1824, when Andrew Jackson won the election in a four-man race but failed to win the number of required electoral votes, and subsequently the House elected John Quincy Adams. Ostensibly, that’s what the Neocons would be hoping for with an establishment third-party run in 2016.

Show less

1

1

Volunteers for Nehlen on Anedot

Volunteers for Nehlen on Anedot



Please help in Wisconsin Congressional Race if you can.  We are going to defeat Paul Ryan with everyones'  help

Paul Ryan Oozing Hypocrisy on Outside Interests, Says Wisconsin Congressional Challenger Paul Nehlen | Paul Nehlen

Paul Ryan Oozing Hypocrisy on Outside Interests, Says Wisconsin Congressional Challenger Paul Nehlen | Paul Nehlen

Dangers and Threats: Common Core

Dangers and Threats: Common Core

Despite the participation of the National Governors Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (NCSSO), the Common Core standards are NOT state-led initiatives, as proponents of Common Core would have you believe.

Steven Yates -- Hillary Clinton Presidency Would Be an Unmitigated Disaster for U.S. and the World

Steven Yates -- Hillary Clinton Presidency Would Be an Unmitigated Disaster for U.S. and the World

Betty Freauf -- The Politically Incorrect Trump Card Causes Confusion

Betty Freauf -- The Politically Incorrect Trump Card Causes Confusion

GET US OUT OF THE UNITED NATIONS

Readers may need to be reminded it was Republican President Richard Nixon who created United Nations Regional government on February 10, 1972 with Executive Order 11647. This E.O. divided us into ten regions giving rise to the Administrative State of Alphabet soup federal regulatory agencies exercising unconstitutional power which had been planned by FDR, later instituted by Richard Nixon and was modeled after plans by Mussolini and Stalin.[2] The “Administrative Rule” gives false power to Metro Authorities.

Laurie Roth - The Impossible still happens in America

Laurie Roth - The Impossible still happens in America

Tom DeWeese -- Six Issues That Are Agenda 21

Tom DeWeese -- Six Issues That Are Agenda 21



Because, you see, today’s public education system is also designed to strip the children of their attitudes, values and beliefs that parents may have instilled, and indoctrinate them into accepting global values - global citizenship and a global economy based on the sustainable agenda. Little of American civics and history are taught in today’s classroom. But text books contain whole chapters on the Five Pillars of Islam, while ignoring the 10 Commandments of Christianity. The children are fed an unending diet of the evils of capitalism; the selfishness of individualism, and the social justice of redistribution of wealth. It punishes students for possessing individuality and is designed to eliminate such natural human tendencies. That is the "common" in Common Core. Common values, common goals, common future. Don't rock the boat of a well ordered society.

Obama Attacks Sen. Rand Paul for Protecting Fourth Amendment

Obama Attacks Sen. Rand Paul for Protecting Fourth Amendment

Obama is angry about opposition to his anti-privacy crusade. Last week, he even slammed Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.; shown) by name, calling on the liberty-minded lawmaker to drop his “quirky” opposition to the administration's controversial new “tax treaties” — agreements with foreign governments to further shred the Fourth Amendment-protected privacy rights of the American people. However, Paul hit back hard, telling Obama, publicly, that Americans' unalienable privacy rights are not “quirky.” Privacy proponents celebrated Paul's “courageous” stand.

By insulting and ridiculing Paul, Obama, a former “community organizer,” was relying on tactics popularized by the late community organizing guru Saul Alinsky. In his hugely influential how-to manual Rules for Radicals, which the radical pro-tyranny activist openly dedicated to Lucifer, Alinsky urges his disciples to mock those who stand in their way. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon,” Alinsky wrote. “There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.”

Obama, who spent years as a “community organizer” agitating for Big Government in Chicago, apparently learned the lessons well. “I’m calling on the Senate, in particular Sen. Rand Paul, who’s been a little quirky on this issue, to stop blocking the implementation of tax treaties that have been pending for years,” Obama was quoted as saying at the White House on May 6. “These treaties actually improve law enforcement's ability to investigate and crack down on offshore tax evasion. And I'm assuming that's not something that he's in favor of.”

So, in short, in Obama's view, because Senator Paul takes seriously his oath to protect the U.S. Constitution, he is “quirky” and might even be in favor of offshore tax evasion if he does not surrender, quickly. At least that is what Obama wanted people to think. But while the establishment media — particularly the Associated Press — did help telegraph Obama's bizarre insults and ridicule nationwide, it also allowed Paul a chance to explain to Americans why he has been working hard to protect the rights of all Americans.   

On Twitter, Senator Paul responded to a message quoting Obama, sent out by Tal Kopan, a Digital CNN Politics Reporter, with his own zinger. “Privacy and 4th Amendment rights are not 'quirky,'” he told Obama in a response to the CNN reporter's tweet. The response among Twitter users was overwhelming: Rand Paul is right to protect the privacy rights of Americans, and the Obama administration and its apparatchiks in the establishment media are wrong to demonize Paul and his defense of the Constitution.    

But beyond sound bites and PR victories against Obama's Alinsky tactics, Senator Paul has been almost single-handedly protecting what remains of Americans' financial privacy from a rogue administration that appears bound and determined to put the final nails into the coffin of financial privacy — all while helping build a global tax regime with dangerous implications. From suing the IRS and the Treasury to putting a hold on new privacy-shredding “tax treaties” that trample the Fourth Amendment's protections, Paul has been largely forced to go it alone. But his efforts are worthwhile, and have been fruitful, as evidenced by Obama's quirky insults.   

Late last year, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved what is known as the “Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance.” The radical measure would purport to mandate that the U.S. government collect and share with foreign governments and regimes — including brutal communist and Islamist dictatorships — a broad array of private financial information on accounts 

Romney Foreign Policy Shows Strong CFR, Neo-con Influence

Romney Foreign Policy Shows Strong CFR, Neo-con Influence

“The True Story of the Bilderberg Group” and What They May Be Planning Now

Secret Bilderberg Partners

In the US, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is dominant. One of its 1921 founders, Edward Mandell House, was Woodrow Wilson’s chief advisor and rumored at the time to be the nation’s real power from 1913 – 1921. On his watch, the Federal Reserve Act passed in December 1913 giving money creation power to bankers, and the 16th Amendment was ratified in February creating the federal income tax to provide a revenue stream to pay for government debt service.

From its beginnings, CFR was committed to “a one-world government based on a centralized global financing system….” Today, CFR has thousands of influential members (including important ones in the corporate media) but keeps a low public profile, especially regarding its real agenda.

Historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. called it a “front organization (for) the heart of the American Establishment.” It meets privately and only publishes what it wishes the public to know. Its members are only Americans.

The Trilateral Commission (discussed below) is a similar group that “brings together global power brokers.” Founded by David Rockefeller, he’s also a leading Bilderberger and CFR Chairman Emeritus, organizations he continues to finance and support.

Their past and current members reflect their power:

– nearly all presidential candidates of both parties;

– leading senators and congressmen;

– key members of the fourth estate and their bosses; and

– top officials of the FBI, CIA, NSA, defense establishment, and other leading government agencies, including state, commerce, the judiciary and treasury.

For its part, “CFR has served as a virtual employment agency for the federal government under both Democrats and Republicans.” Whoever occupies the White House, “CFR’s power and agenda” have been unchanged since its 1921 founding.

It advocates a global superstate with America and other nations sacrificing their sovereignty to a central power. CFR founder Paul Warburg was a member of Roosevelt’s “brain trust.” In 1950, his son, James, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: “We shall have world government whether or not you like it – by conquest or consent.”

Later at the 1992 Bilderberg Group meeting, Henry Kissinger said:

“Today, Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow, they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all people of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil….individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by their world government.”

CFR planned a New World Order before 1942, and the “UN began with a group of CFR members called the Informal Agenda Group.” They drafted the original UN proposal, presented it to Franklin Roosevelt who announced it publicly the next day. At its 1945 founding, CFR members comprised over 40 of the US delegates.

According to Professor G. William Domhoff, author of Who Rules America, the CFR operates in “small groups of about twenty-five, who bring together leaders from the six conspirator categories (industrialists, financiers, ideologues, military, professional specialists – lawyers, medical doctors, etc. – and organized labor) for detailed discussions of specific topics in the area of foreign affairs.” Domhoff added:

“The Council on Foreign Relations, while not financed by government, works so closely with it that it is difficult to distinguish Council action stimulated by government from autonomous actions. (Its) most important sources of income are leading corporations and major foundations.” The Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Ford Foundations to name three, and they’re directed by key corporate officials.

Dominant Media Partners

Former CBS News president Richard Salant (1961 – 64 and 1966 – 79) explained the major media’s role: “Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have.”

CBS and other media giants control everything we see, hear and read – through television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, films, and large portions of the Internet. Their top officials and some journalists attend Bilderberg meetings – on condition they report nothing.

The Rockefeller family wields enormous power, even though its reigning patriarch, David, will be 94 on June 12 and surely near the end of his dominance. However, for years “the Rockefellers (led by David) gained great influence over the media. (With it) the family gained sway over public opinion. With the pulse of public opinion, they gained deep influence in politics. And with this politics of subtle corruption, they are taking control of the nation” and now aim for total world domination.

The Bilderberger-Rockefeller scheme is to make their views “so appealing (by camouflaging them) that they become public policy (and can) pressure world leaders into submitting to the ‘needs of the Masters of the Universe.’ ” The “free world press” is their instrument to disseminate “agreed-upon propaganda.”

CFR Cabinet Control

“The National Security Act of 1947 established the office of Secretary of Defense.” Since then, 14 DOD secretaries have been CFR members.

Since 1940, every Secretary of State, except James Byrnes, has been a CFR member and/or Trilateral Commission (TC) one.

For the past 80 years, “Virtually every key US National Security and Foreign Policy Advisor has been a CFR member.

Nearly all top generals and admirals have been CFR members.

Many presidential candidates were/are CFR members, including Herbert Hoover, Adlai Stevenson, Dwight Eisenhower, John Kennedy, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter (also a charter TC member), George HW Bush, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, and John McCain.

Numerous CIA directors were/are CFR members, including Richard Helmes, James Schlesinger, William Casey, William Webster, Robert Gates, James Woolsey, John Deutsch, George Tenet, Porter Goss, Michael Hayden, and Leon Panetta.

Many Treasury Secretaries were/are CFR members, including Douglas Dillon, George Schultz, William Simon, James Baker, Nicholas Brady, Lloyd Bentsen, Robert Rubin, Henry Paulson, and Tim Geithner.

When presidents nominate Supreme Court candidates, the CFR’s “Special Group, Secret Team” or advisors vet them for acceptability. Presidents, in fact, are told who to appoint, including designees to the High Court and most lower ones.

Programming the Public Mind

According to sociologist Hadley Cantril in his 1967 book, The Human Dimension – Experiences in Policy Research:

Government “Psycho-political operations are propaganda campaigns designed to create perpetual tension and to manipulate different groups of people to accept the particular climate of opinion the CFR seeks to achieve in the world.”

Canadian writer Ken Adachi (1929 – 1989) added:

“What most Americans believe to be ‘Public Opinion’ is in reality carefully crafted and scripted propaganda designed to elicit a desired behavioral response from the public.”

And noted Australian academic and activist Alex Carey (1922 – 1988) explained the three most important 20th century developments – “The growth of democracy, the growth of corporate power, and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate power against democracy.”

Web of Control

Numerous think tanks, foundations, the major media, and other key organizations are staffed with CFR members. Most of its life-members also belong to the TC and Bilderberg Group, operate secretly, and wield enormous power over US and world affairs.

The Rockefeller-Founded Trilateral Commission (TC)

On page 405 of his Memoirs, David Rockfeller wrote:

“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

In alliance with Bilderbergers, the TC also “plays a vital role in the New World Order’s scheme to use wealth, concentrated in the hands of the few, to exert world control.” TC members share common views and all relate to total unchallengeable global dominance.

Founded in 1973 and headquartered in Washington, its powerful US, EU and East Asian members seek its operative founding goal – a “New International Economic Order,” now simply a “New World Order” run by global elites from these three parts of the world with lesser members admitted from other countries.

According to TC’s web site, “each regional group has a chairman and deputy chairman, who all together constitute the leadership of the Committee. The Executive Committee draws together a further 36 individuals from the wider membership,” proportionately representing the US, EU, and East Asia in its early years, now enlarged to be broadly global.

Committee members meet several times annually to discuss and coordinate their work. The Executive Committee chooses members, and at any time around 350 belong for a three-year renewable period. Everyone is a consummate insider with expertise in business, finance, politics, the military, or the media, including past presidents, secretaries of state, international bankers, think tank and foundation executives, university presidents and selected academics, and former senators and congressmen, among others.

Although its annual reports are available for purchase, its inner workings, current goals, and operations are secret – with good reason. Its objectives harm the public so mustn’t be revealed. Trilaterals over Washington author Antony Sutton wrote:

“this group of private citizens is precisely organized in a manner that ensures its collective views have significant impact on public policy.”

In her book, Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management, Holly Sklar wrote:

Powerful figures in America, Europe, and East Asia let “the rich….safeguard the

Dave Daubenmire -- The Supreme Court’s Bait and Switch

Dave Daubenmire -- The Supreme Court’s Bait and Switch



Judicial tyranny is breaking out all across America as Obama’s Justice Department is being used to “fundamentally transform” this nation. This transformation is being accomplished by the out-of-control oligarchy currently masquerading as a court system.

Lee Duigon -- Is Trump Truly a Disaster?

Lee Duigon -- Is Trump Truly a Disaster?

In the last national elections, the American people gave the Republicans majorities in both houses of Congress, hoping that the opposition party might finally mount some opposition to a lawless president who has already provided the unmitigated disaster feared by Dr. Sowell. The disaster has already happened, and its name is Barack Hussein Obama. But the Republican Congress has not done what the people elected it to do. There has been no opposition. Republican Senators confirmed the aptly-named Loretta Lynch as attorney general. Lynch now seeks to criminalize disbelief in imaginary Man-Made Climate Change. The American people want their country’s borders secured against illegal immigration—and the Republicans won’t do it. They talk about it, but they don’t do it. We wanted Planned Parenthood defunded, and the Republicans were afraid to do it. The Speaker of the House said it was impossible. We wanted a coherent foreign policy that didn’t make the world a worse place for everyone but Islamic jihad-mongers, but the Republicans didn’t even ask for one. We want an end to the Democrats’ perpetual campaign to disable Christianity as any kind of influence on public policy, to stigmatize Christians as “haters” and use the government to force them to act against their principles, and overthrow every tradition, every institution, cherished by Christians in America from the beginning of her history. But the “conservatives” in the GOP just don’t care enough about those silly social issues that only matters to us bitter clingers, as Obama once described us, in flyover country. The GOP conservatives never conserve anything. Again and again, all Obama ever had to do to stifle the Republicans was threaten to shut down the government and blame it on them. It always worked; again and again the Republicans surrendered. They are always much more afraid of the liberal nooze media calling then racists than they ever were afraid of the poor suckers who elected them. We already have a disaster, and it’s hard to imagine what Donald Trump could do to make it worse. Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, when she’s not preoccupied with grabbing for more money, will double down on Obama’s policies and try her level best to finish the job of dismembering the Constitution. There can be no doubt of this. Whatever our fears, we really don’t know what Donald Trump would do as president. But we do know what Hillary would do—and we’ll have no one but ourselves to blame if we allow her to do it. Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily Email Alerts Email Address* First Name  *required field Building up a country is a rare accomplishment, but destroying one is easy. You’d think, after eight years of Obama, with the ogress Clinton waiting in the wings, that Americans would grab for the first rope ladder that anyone drops down to them—that we’d do just about anything to climb out of this hole. Trump has offered us a ladder. The more fool us, if we don’t take it. I have discussed these topics, and others, on my blog, http://leeduigon.com, throughout the week. Please stop by and read! All it takes is just one click to get you there. © 2016 Lee Duigon - All Rights Reserved    Share This Article Click Here For Mass E-mailing Lee Duigon, a contributing editor with the Chalcedon Foundation, is a former newspaper reporter and editor, small businessman, teacher, and horror novelist. He has been married to his wife, Patricia, for 34 years. See his new fantasy/adventure novels, Bell Mountain and The Cellar Beneath the Cellar, available on www.amazon.com Website: LeeDuigon.com E-Mail: leeduigon@verizon.net Home

To make a long story short, I had to eat all the food and I was feeling awfully shaky by the time we got up to go home. I almost fell over when I picked up Elsie and carried her up the driveway.

Ron Ewart -- Will You Be The Government’s Next Target?

Ron Ewart -- Will You Be The Government’s Next Target?

Kelleigh Nelson -- Be Very Afraid of the Real Globalist Newt Ginrich

Kelleigh Nelson -- Be Very Afraid of the Real Globalist Newt Ginrich

Your enemy to take you down has a much easier job when he seems to be your friend....This holds true for Newt , Paul Ryan and so many others.....they are true neo-cons...not conservative at all, but use that term to fool the people....I have been writing about Newt....and others for years.... and passing along facts...it seems none read....

Newt Masquerades as a Conservative

Newt masquerades as a rightwing conservative, but is one of the most dangerous enemies of freedom.

Gingrich is a college professor, historian, and author, and he twice ran unsuccessfully for the House before winning a seat in the election of November 1978. He was re-elected ten times, and his activism as a member of the House's Republican minority eventually enabled him to succeed Dick Cheney as House Minority Whip in 1989. As a co-author of the 1994 Contract with America, Gingrich was in the forefront of the Republican Party's dramatic success in that year's Congressional elections and subsequently was elected Speaker of the House.

Newt received his PhD in modern European history from Tulane University in New Orleans in 1971. At Tulane University he accepted student deferments rather than being drafted to Viet Nam. He experimented with marijuana. He led a campus demonstration defending the school paper's right to print a photo of a nude faculty member. And in 1968 he campaigned for Nelson Rockefeller.

In 1990, he became a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. If you've never read Richard N. Gardner's April 1974 article in CFR's World Affairs, Gardner called for an end run around national sovereignty eroding it piece by piece. The CFR was founded in 1921 for world government and eliminating national independence. Henry Kissinger is also a CFR member and actually schooled Newt, and both claim they're conservatives. Newt is also a fellow at phony conservative think tanks, the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and Hoover Institution, focusing on U.S. politics, world history, national security policy, and environmental policy issues. Trotskyite Irving Kristol was a senior fellow at AEI, and Richard Allen, author of NAFTA while at Heritage Foundation, is a Hoover fellow.

Gingrich has been married three times. In 1962, he married his first wife, Jackie Battley, who was 6 years his senior and his high school geometry teacher. In the spring of 1980, Gingrich left Battley after having an affair with Marianne Ginther.

According to Battley, Gingrich visited her while she was in the hospital recovering from uterine cancer surgery to discuss the details of their divorce. Six months after the divorce was final, Gingrich wed Marianne Ginther in 1981. In the mid-1990s, Gingrich began an affair with House of Representatives staffer, Callista Bisek, who is 23 years his junior. They continued their affair during the Lewinsky scandal, when Gingrich was a leader of the Republican investigation of President Clinton for perjury in connection with his alleged affairs with Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky. In 1999, over the Mother's Day weekend and on the same day his second wife had been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, Gingrich informed her he had found someone else.

In 2000, Gingrich married Bisek shortly after his divorce from second wife Ginther. He and Callista currently live in McLean, Virginia. If I were Callista, I'd take extremely good care of my health.

Gingrich’s Voting Record

Newt was elected Congressman from Georgia in 1978. In 1979 he voted:

1. YEA to the creation of the Department of Education, which is unconstitutional (William Z. Foster called for a federal Department of Education in his book, "Towards Soviet America.") Studies were to be cleansed of religious, patriotic and other features of the 'bourgeois' ideology. Students were to be taught the basis of Marxian dialectical materialism, inter-nationalism and general ethics of the new Socialist Society. [Link], [Link]

Donald J. Trump wants to eliminate the Department of Education.

2. YEA to designating 68 million acres as Federal protected wilderness. Our constitution doesn't call for any land "control," but the communist manifesto calls for all abolition of property and land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. Federal Land grabs today are huge percentages of the 13 western states that are now federally owned.

Donald J. Trump believes in property rights, not the confiscation of properties by the Bureau of Land Management, the EPA, and the Federal Government.

In 1994 Newt voted:

1. YEA to the National Endowment for the Arts
2. YEA for 1.2 billion for UN peacekeeping
3. YEA for the presidential line item veto
4. YEA for 13 billion in foreign aid
5. YEA for 166 million more for the IRS
6. Led Congress into GATT with fellow CFR member Bill Clinton and then stated that it was a very big transfer of power. It was, because it overrode Article 1, Section 8 of the constitution. As well, GATT reduces the amount of money we can save for pensions. He jawed with President Clinton in NH, that he was a huge fan of FDR and Woodrow Wilson, two of the most despised early communist leaning presidents. Remember Wilson gave us both the federal reserve and the 16th amendment, income tax.

Donald J. Trump would never approve of this type of spending. And he certainly is against these trade deals which destroy American jobs.

Newt also voted:

1. China as Most Favored Nation for trade.
2. Voted to supply funds to subsidize trade with the Soviets.
3. Voted to transfer 2.2 million acres in Idaho to Wilderness status.
4. Voted for federal funding loan guarantees for greater trade with Red China.
5. Voted for taxpayer funds being available to foreign governments through export/import banks.
6. Is pro amnesty - Joe Galloway wrote in December 2010 that both Newt and Jeb Bush were pro-amnesty. Gingrich stated, "We are not going to deport 11 million immigrants." How about 40 million Newt...send them home, they're an invasion! [Link]
7. Is pro foreign aid. In 1995 he voted for 31.8 billion in foreign aid, but wouldn't vote to cut foreign aid by a measly 1%.

Donald J. Trump is strongly against amnesty and wants to protect our borders and build that wall.

Newt also backed a strong central government, strong environmental laws, national service programs, the United Nations Goals 2000 (which many Republicans voted for), federal financing of local police, and UN peacekeeping missions for our military.

8. Gingrich is pro-Obamacare and even advocated it in the 90s on Meet the Press, and recently. [Link]

Donald Trump says Obamacare should be repealed and replaced.

9. Newt did a Global Warming ad with Nancy Pelosi that is coming back to haunt him, and in reality, he is a big environmentalist.

10. Newt is pro-gun control.

If you check on the voting list of those who voted "yea" on Public Law 101-216 in 1989 (an update to the General and Complete Disarmament Law, Public Law 87-297) you will find that Newt Gingrich voted in favor of section 2 of this disarmament bill which reads:

"(2) as defined in this Act, the terms 'arms control' and 'disarmament' mean 'the identification, verification, inspection, limitation, control, reduction, or elimination, of armed forces and armaments of all kinds under international agreement to establish an effective system of international control.”

Should we trust a man who professes to be so concerned with our security and right to have armed forces, who also votes to give them away to the United Nations for a world army? The last thing we need is someone who professes to protect us, while at the same time, is planning to sell us out! See Bernadine Smith's website for countless documents.

Donald J. Trump is strongly pro-Second Amendment.

Newt Gingrich is a Third Waver

We've gone over some of what Newt has done in the past, and part of what he stands for, but we haven't touched at all on his belief in Alvin and Heidi Toffler's THE THIRD WAVE. To make it quite clear, Toffler's beliefs are rooted solidly in communism, but dressed up thoroughly in neo-con speak and sprinkled with the tiniest bit of capitalism. Speaker Gingrich has been a Third Waver since the 1970s.

Newt, who swore an oath 10 times to uphold and defend the Constitution urges with his mentor, Toffler, the very death of the American Constitutional system, and this includes private property rights. He wrote the forward to Toffler's book, "Creating a New Civilization." As New Age authority Constance Cumbey wrote in her article about Gingrich, the very best information on The Third Wave and Newt Gingrich was written by Steve Farrell. Print out Farrell’s 8-part series, and read it carefully. It is a picture of what is happening to America. In a previous article about Newt Gingrich and the Third Wave, I quoted extensively from Steve Farrell’s excellent article.

"The Third Way/Wave may sound new and innocuous to many, but its founders include such earlier notables as Plato (The Republic), Karl Marx (The Communist Manifesto), and Adolf Hitler (National Socialism), certainly not the best crew for men and women sworn to defend our Constitution and to turn to for inspiration."

Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily Email Alerts

Email Address *
First Name

Subscribe *required field
Conclusion

Recent primary voting has shown Republicans that the chosen nominee is Donald J. Trump. Now, many of these Republicans are jumping on the bandwagon to endorse Trump, and the endorsements are appreciated. However, not all of them would line up with Mr. Trump’s positions on the issues, and neither will Trump line up with theirs. Newt Gingrich is hailed as a strong conservative, but his voting record and beliefs belie the label.

[P.S. In order to help Mr. Trump we need to increase the hits to reach more people. Please use this material, and call into talk radio programs (like Rush Limbaugh or Michael Savage, etc.) and mention NewsWithViews.com

 on the air while discussing the content of this article, write letters to newspaper editors, and speak to your friends. Spread the word, and in doing so, we have a chance to save America.]